Медико-биологический
информационный портал
для специалистов
 
Medline.ru

СОДЕРЖАНИЕ ЖУРНАЛА:
Физико-химическая биология

Клиническая медицина

Профилактическая медицина

Медико-биологические науки


АРХИВ:

Фундаментальные исследования

Организация здравохраниения

История медицины и биологии



Последние публикации

Поиск публикаций

Articles

Архив :  2000 г.  2001 г.  2002 г. 
               2003 г.  2004 г.  2005 г. 
               2006 г.  2007 г.  2008 г. 
               2009 г.  2010 г.  2011 г. 
               2012 г.  2013 г.  2014 г. 
               2015 г.  2016 г.  2017 г. 
               2018 г.  2019 г.  2020 г.  2021 г.  2022 г.  2023 г. 

Редакционная информация:
        Опубликовать статью
        Наша статистика


 РЕДАКЦИЯ:
Главный редактор

Заместители главного редактора

Члены редколлегии
Специализированные редколлегии


 УЧРЕДИТЕЛИ:
Институт теоретической и экспериментальной биофизики Российской академии наук.

ООО "ИЦ КОМКОН".




Адрес редакции и реквизиты

199406, Санкт-Петербург, ул.Гаванская, д. 49, корп.2

ISSN 1999-6314

Российская поисковая система
Искать: 


«
Vol. 23, Art. 22 (pp. 332-356)    |    2022       
»

Oncological endoprosthetics of the ankle joint. Literature review
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Samara State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation



Brief summary

The given article presents the comprehensive review on oncological and revisional endoprosthetics of the ankle. The biomechanics, kinematics and anatomical features of the ankle which are highly important for complex understanding of the ankle joint motion, injury genesis and objective evaluation of joint replacement possibility were described by authors. Among the main disorders of the ankle these one were detailed: arthritis, severe posttraumatic deformities of the talus, osteomyelitis; the special attention was paid to the tumors of distal tibia and ankle joint destruction of various aetiology. The main procedure on irreversible disorders of the distal tibia and ankle joint is amputation which still makes the significant number of operations causing disability. The implant instability, periprosthetic infection, ischemia and marginal necrosis of skin flap, as well as metastases and local recurrence are complications of oncological endoprosthetics making engineers and orthopedic oncologists collaborate in development of optimal design for revisional ankle endoprosthesis.


Key words

ankle joint, endoprosthetics, revisional endoprosthetics, oncological endoprosthesis





(The article in PDF format. For preview need Adobe Acrobat Reader)



Open article in new window

Reference list

1. Mascard E, Gaspar N, Brugières L, Glorion C, Pannier S, Gomez-Brouchet A. Malignant tumours of the foot and ankle. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(5):261-271. Published 2017 May 11. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.2.160078


2. Sokolovskii A.V., Sokolovskii V.A., Aliev M.D. Otdalennie rezyltati individyalizirovannogo pervichnogo i povtornogo onkologicheskogo endoprotezirovaniya oblasti golenostopnogo systava pri porajenii dobrokachestvennimi i zlokachestvennimi opyholyami kosti. Sarkomi kostei, myagkih tkanei i opyholei koji 2020; 12: 2-3 S.5-15


3. Peltier LF. Historical note on bone and soft tissue sarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 1985 Dec;30(4):201-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930300403. PMID: 3908827.


4. Wang S, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zheng C, Tu C and Zhou Y (2022) Case Report: Reconstruction of Medialis Malleolus (1/4 of the Ankle Joint) After Resection of Distal Tibia Tumor With an Uncemented Three-Dimensional-Printed Prosthesis. Front. Surg. 9:844334. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.844334


5. D'Ambrosi R, Banfi G, Usuelli FG. Total ankle arthroplasty and national registers: What is the impact on scientific production? Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Aug;25(4):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 6. PMID: 30321963


6. Manit K. Gundavda, Manish G. Agarwal, Rajeev Reddy, Ashik Bary, "Reconstructive Challenges of Distal Tibia Bone Tumors: Extracorporeally Irradiated Autograft Combined with a Nonvascularized Autograft Fibula for Superior Reconstruction and Functional Outcomes When Compared to Ipsilateral Pedicled Fibula Transfer Alone", Sarcoma, vol. 2021, Article ID 6624550, 6 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6624550


7. Li, Y., He, J. and Hu, Y. , Comparison of the Efficiency and Safety of Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Orthop Surg, 12: 372-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12635


8. Miroshnikov D.L., Sabodashevskii O.V., Afaynov A.A., Zamyatin I.I., Matar H.H., Napah U.V. Opit endoprotezirovaniya golenostopnogo systava. Innovacionnaya medicina Kybani. 2017;6(2):15-20.


9. Aliev M.D., Sokolovskii A.V., Sokolovskii V.A., Sergeev P.S. Rezyltati rekonstrykcii golenostopnogo systava mega?protezom pri porajenii opyholu distal?nogo otdela bolshebercovoi kosti. Sarko?mi kostei, myagkih tkanei i opyholi koji, 2010;4:13-8.


10. Mizoshiri, N., Shirai, T., Terauchi, R. et al. Limb saving surgery for Ewing?s sarcoma of the distal tibia: a case report. BMC Cancer 18, 503 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4372-z


11. Jennifer M. Medina McKeon, Matthew C. Hoch; The Ankle-Joint Complex: A Kinesiologic Approach to Lateral Ankle Sprains. J Athl Train 1 June 2019; 54 (6): 589-602. doi: https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-472-17


12. Golanó, P., Vega, J., de Leeuw, P.A.J. et al. Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 557-569 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1100-x


13. Tantigate, D., Noback, P.C., Bäcker, H.C., Seetharaman, M., Greisberg, J.K. and Vosseller, J.T. (2018), Anatomy of the ankle capsule: A cadaveric study. Clin. Anat., 31: 1018-1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23219


14. Amaha, K., Nimura, A., Yamaguchi, R. et al. Anatomic study of the medial side of the ankle base on the joint capsule: an alternative description of the deltoid and spring ligament. J EXP ORTOP 6, 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0171-y


15. Bianchi, S., Martinoli, C., Gaignot, C., De Gautard, R., & Meyer, J.-M. (2005). Ultrasound of the Ankle: Anatomy of the Tendons, Bursae, and Ligaments. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 09(03), 243-259. doi:10.1055/s-2005-921943


16. Brockett CL, Chapman GJ. Biomechanics of the ankle. Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(3):232-238. doi:10.1016/j.mporth.2016.04.015


17. Leardini, A., O?Connor, J.J. & Giannini, S. Biomechanics of the natural, arthritic, and replaced human ankle joint. J Foot Ankle Res 7, 8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-8


18. Liu, CL., Zhou, JP., Sun, PT. et al. Influence of different knee and ankle ranges of motion on the elasticity of triceps surae muscles, Achilles tendon, and plantar fascia. Sci Rep 10, 6643 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63730-0


19. Narushima, T., Ueda, K., & Alfirano. (2015). Co-Cr Alloys as Effective Metallic Biomaterials. Advances in Metallic Biomaterials, 157-178. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46836-4_7


20. Sarraf, M., Rezvani Ghomi, E., Alipour, S. et al. A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Bio-des. Manuf. 5, 371-395 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00170-3


21. Punj, S., Singh, J., & Singh, K. (2021). Ceramic biomaterials: Properties, state of the art and future prospectives. Ceramics International, 47(20), 28059-28074. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.238


22. Hussain M, Naqvi RA, Abbas N, et al. Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight-Polyethylene (UHMWPE) as a Promising Polymer Material for Biomedical Applications: A Concise Review. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(2):323. Published 2020 Feb 4. doi:10.3390/polym12020323


23. Pałka, K., & Pokrowiecki, R. (2018). Porous Titanium Implants: A Review. Advanced Engineering Materials, 20(5), 1700648. doi:10.1002/adem.201700648


24. Liu, S., Wang, Q., Liu, W., Tang, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, H., Wang, L. (2021). Multi-scale hybrid modified coatings on titanium implants for non-cytotoxicity and antibacterial properties. Nanoscale, 13(23), 10587-10599. doi:10.1039/d1nr02459k


25. Zhiqing Zhao, Taiqiang Yan, Wei Guo, Rongli Yang, Xiaodong Tang, Wei Wang, Surgical options and reconstruction strategies for primary bone tumors of distal tibia: A systematic review of complications and functional outcome, Journal of Bone Oncology, Volume 14, 2019, 100209, ISSN 2212-1374, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2018.100209.


26. Evans, D.R., Lazarides, A.L., Visgauss, J.D. et al. Limb salvage versus amputation in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities: an update in the modern era using the National Cancer Database. BMC Cancer 20, 995 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07502-z


27. Selvam, P. S. , Sandhiya, M., Chandrasekaran, K., Rubella, D. H. , & Karthikeyan, S. (2021). Prosthetics for Lower Limb Amputation. In (Ed.), Prosthetics and Orthotics. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95593


28. Ajibade A, Akinniyi OT, Okoye CS. Indications and complications of major limb amputations in Kano, Nigeria. Ghana Med J. 2013;47(4):185-188.


29. Qureshi MK, Ghaffar A, Tak S, Khaled A. Limb Salvage Versus Amputation: A Review of the Current Evidence [published correction appears in Cureus. 2020 Oct 7;12(10):c38]. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e10092. Published 2020 Aug 28. doi:10.7759/cureus.10092


30. Roșca AC, Baciu CC, Burtăverde V, Mateizer A. Psychological Consequences in Patients With Amputation of a Limb. An Interpretative-Phenomenological Analysis. Front Psychol. 2021;12:537493. Published 2021 May 26. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.537493


31. Jauregui, J.J., Nadarajah, V., Munn, J. et al. Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: a Systematic Review. Indian J Surg Oncol 9, 232-240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-0725-y


32. Kerkhoff Y.R., Kosse N.M., Metsaars W.P., Louwerens J.W. Long-term Functional and Radiographic OutCome of a Mobile Bearing Ankle Prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37(12): 1292-302


33. Lee S.H., Kim H.S., Park Y.B. et al. Prosthetic reconstruction for tumors of the distal tibia and fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81-B:803-7.


34. A. Abudu, R.J Grimer, R.M. Tillman, S.R. Carter. Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint for aggressive bone tumours / 1999; 23(5):291-4.


35. A. S. Shekkeris, S. A. Hanna, M. D. Sewell, B. G. I. Spiegelberg, W. J. S. Aston, G. W. Blunn, S. R. Cannon, T. W. R. Briggs The journal of bone and joint surgery Vol. 91-b, no. 10, October 2009


36. Hamada K, Naka N, Murata Y, Yasui Y, Joyama S, Araki N. Prosthetic reconstruction for tumors of the distal tibia. Report of two cases. Foot (Edinb). 2011 Sep;21(3):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Feb 18. PMID: 21334192.


37. Karpenko V.U., Byharov A.V., Kyrilchik A.A. i dr. Endoprotezirovanie pri opyholevom porajenii distalnih otdelov konechnostei. Onkologiya. Jyrnal im. P.A.Gercena, 2017; 6(5): 31-6.


38. Feng D, He J, Zhang C, Wang L, Gu X, Guo Y. 3D-Printed Prosthesis Replacement for Limb Salvage after Radical Resection of an Ameloblastoma in the Tibia with 1 Year of Follow Up: A Case Report. Yonsei Med J. 2019 Sep;60(9):882-886. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.9.882


39. S Subbiah, G Gopu, Dr. Syed Afroze Hussain, Dr. Bharanidharan. Distal tibial osteosarcoma: A technique of custom mega prostheses reconstruction. Int J Orthop Sci 2017;3(1):233-236. DOI: 10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i1d.38





Свидетельство о регистрации сетевого электронного научного издания N 077 от 29.11.2006
Журнал основан 16 ноября 2000г.
Выдано Министерством РФ по делам печати, телерадиовещания и средств массовых коммуникаций
(c) Перепечатка материалов сайта Medline.Ru возможна только с письменного разрешения редакции

Размещение рекламы

Rambler's Top100