Опубликовать статью

Информационное партнерство

Инфоресурсы

Контакты

«

Vol. 22, Art. 2 (pp. 21-34)    |    2021       

»

Efficiency and safety of the titanium-based dynamic stabilization system in patients with degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spine and reduced bone density

1 Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, Saint Petersburg
2 Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg
3 SOGAZ Medical Center, Gelendzhik
4 First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg
5 North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, Saint Petersburg

Brief summary

The results of surgical treatment of 103 patients with degenerative stenosis of the spinal canal using titanium dynamic stabilization systems against the background of a decrease in bone density have been analyzed. Bone density was studied in a group of patients with revealed bone erosion near the implant. The effectiveness of the use of titanium-based dynamic stabilization systems in persons with osteoporosis has been confirmed. The criteria for selecting patients with reduced bone density for the use of titanium-based dynamic stabilization systems have been determined


Key words

Spinal stenosis, interspinous dynamic stabilization, decreased bone densit

Reference list

1. Ya-Peng W, Ji-Long A, Ya-Peng S, et al. Comparison of outcomes between minimallyinvasive transforaminal lumbarinterbodyfusion and traditional posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion in obese patients with lumbar disk prolapse. Therap Clin Risk Manag 2017;13:87-94.


2. Gao T, Lai Q, Zhou S, et al. Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:483-90.


3. R.A. Deyo, S.K. Mirza, B.I. Martin, et al., Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults, Jama 303 (13) (2010) 1259.


4. M. Du Bois, M. Szpalski, P. Donceel, A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009, Eur. Spine J. 21 (12) (2012) 2693 official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.


5. Lee SH, Seol A, Cho TY, et al. A Systematic Review of Interspinous Dynamic Stabilization. Clin Orthop Surg 2015; 7 (3): 323-9. DOI: 10.4055 / cios. 2015.7.3.323.


6. Sakaura H, Yamashita T, Miwa T, et al. Symptomatic adjacent segment pathology after posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Global Spine J 2013; 3 (4): 219-24. DOI: 10.1055 / s-0033-1348088


7. Khan SU, Winnicka L, Saleem MA, et al. Amiodarone, lidocaine, magnesium or placebo in shock refractory ventricular arrhythmia: a bayesian network meta-analysis. Heart Lung 2017;46:417-24


8. Jin L, Hao L, Tao L, et al. Coflex interspinous process dynamic reconstruction system for treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in 18 cases. J Clinl Rehabil Tissue Eng Res 2011;15:1579-82.


9. Yu P, Qiang H, Zhou J, et al. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus micro-endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Med Sci Monit 2019;25:2320-8.


10. Bivalcev V. A., Kalinin A. A. Ispolzovanie minimalno invazivnih metodik rigidnoi stabilizacii poyasnichnogo otdela pozvonochnika y rabotnikov OAO «RJD». Medicina tryda i promishlennaya ekologiya 2018; 1: 39-43.


11. Bivalcev V. A., Kalinin A. A., Okoneshnikova A. K. i dr. Fasetochnaya fiksaciya v kombinacii s mejtelovim spondilodezom: sravnitelnii analiz i klinicheskii opit novogo sposoba hiryrgicheskogo lecheniya pacientov s degenerativnimi zabolevaniyami poyasnichnogo otdela pozvonochnika. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii medicinskih nayk 2016: 71 (5): 375-83. DOI: 10.15690 / vramn738.


12. Shamie AN, Mroz T, Suen P, et al. Minimally invasive spinal surgery. China Comtemp Med 2016;21:442-50.


13. Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-Stop device / C. Bowers, A. Amini, A.T. Dailey, M.H. Schmidt // Neurosurg. Focus. 2010. Vol. 28, N 6. P. E8. doi: 0.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1047.


14. The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis / Z. Wan, S. Wang, M. Kozanek, Q. Xia, F.L. Mansfield, G. Lü, K.B. Wood, G. Li // Eur. Spine J. 2012. Vol. 21, N 3. P. 400-410. Doi: 10.1007/s00586-0112021-1


15. The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine / D.P. Lindsey, K.E. Swanson, P. Fuchs, K.Y. Hsu, J.F. Zucherman, S.A. Yerby // Spine. 2003. Vol. 28, N 19. P. 2192-2197.


16. The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures / K.E. Swanson, D.P. Lindsey, K.Y. Hsu, J.F. Zucherman, S.A. Yerby // Spine. 2003. Vol. 28, N 1. P. 26-32


17. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X Stop interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results / J.F. Zucherman, K.Y. Hsu, C.A. Hartjen, T.F. Mehalic, D.A. Implicito, M.J. Martin, D.R. Johnson 2nd, G.A. Skidmore, P.P. Vessa, J.W. Dwyer, S.T. Puccio, J.C. Cauthen, R.M. Ozuna // Spine. 2005. Vol. 30, N 12. P. 1351-1358.


18. Landi A. Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication? // World J. Clin. Cases. 2014. Vol. 2, N 9. P. 402-408.


19. The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine / A. Fujiwara, K. Tamai, H.S. An, T. Kurihashi, T.H. Lim, H. Yoshida, K. Saotome // J. Spinal Disord. 2000. Vol. 13, N 5. P. 444-450.


20. White A.A., Panjabi M.M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd ed. // Philadelphia: Lippincott. 1990. (2). C. 18-20.


21. Fay LY, Wu JC, Tsai TY, Wu CL, Huang WC and Cheng H: Dynamic stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis: Evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115;535‑541. doi: 10.1016 / j. clineuro.2012.05.036


22. Prydnikova O.G., Homchenkov M.V. Dinamicheskaya mejostistaya fiksaciya pri spinalnom poyasnichnom stenoze: kompromiss ili variant resheniya? // Genii ortopedii. ? 2018. ? T.24. ? ?1. ? S. 64-69. [Prudnikova OG, Khomchenkov MV. Dynamic interspinous fixation in spinal lumbar stenosis: a compromise or solution? Genij ortopedii. 2018;24(1):64-69. (In Russ).


23. Bersnev V.P., Dragyn V.M., Mikailov S.U., Kydziev A.V. Hiryrgicheskoe lechenie poyasnichnogo spinalnogo stenoza s primeneniem mejostistih implantiryushih ystroistv // Politravma. ? 2016. ? ?1. ? S. 18-23. [Bersnev VP, Dragun VM, Mikailov SYu, Kudziev AV. Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis using interspinous implant devices. Politrauma. 2016;(1):18-23.


24. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(14);1329-1338. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4


25. Nikitin A.S., Grin A.A. Sochetanie degenerativnogo stenoza pozvonochnogo kanala s deformaciei pozvonochnika na poyasnichnom yrovne. Obzor literatyri // Neirohiryrgiya. ? 2018. ? T.20. ? ?3. ? S. 91-103. [Nikitin AS, Grin AA. The combination of degenerative stenosis of the spinal canal with spinal deformity at the lumbar level. Literature review. Neurosurgery. 2018;20(3):91-103.


26. Yang M, Li C, Chen Z, Bai Y and Li M: Short term outcome of posterior dynamic stabilization system in degenerative lumbar diseases. Indian J. Orthop. 48: 574‑581, 2014.


27. Lee N, Shin DA, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Shin HC, et al. Paradoxical radiographic changes of Coflex interspinous device with minimum 2-year follow-up in lumbar spinal stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2016;85:177-84


28. Bae HW, Lauryssen C, Maislin G, Leary S, Musacchio MJ Jr. Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment. Int J Spine Surg. 2015;9:15


29. Liu X, Liu Y, Lian X, Xu J. Magnetic resonance imaging on disc degeneration changes after implantation of an interspinous spacer and fusion of the adjacent segment. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):6097-102.


30. Zhuomao M, Dong L, Renwen Z, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Coflex, Wallis, and X-stop forlumbardegenerativediseases: asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018;172:74-81.


31. White AH, von Rogov P, Zucherrnan J, et al. Lumbar 1aminectomy for herniateddisc:aprospectivecontrolledcomparisonwithintemal fixation fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:305-7.


32. Boden SD, Balderston RA, Heller JG, et al. An AOA critical issue. Disc replacements:thistimewillwereallycurelow-backandneckpain?Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:411-22.


33. Hambly MF, Wiltse LL, Raghavan N, et al. The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:1785-92.


34. Zhao X, Du L, Xie YZ, Zhao J. Effect of lumbar lordosis on the adjacent segment in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:E114 -20


35. Ruberte LM, Natarajan RN, Andersson GBJ. Influence of single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease on the behavior of the adjacent segments-a finite element model study. J Biomech. 2009;42(3):341 -8


36. Park SC, Yoon SH, Hong YP, Kim KJ, Chung SK, Kim HJ. Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with inter-spinous U (Coflex ). J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;46;292-299. Doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.4.292


37. Xu D, Chen YH, Zeng HB, Chi YL, Xu HZ. [A short-term follow-up results of lumbar disc her-niation by Coflex]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;47;1379-1382. Doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2009.18.006


38. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29;1938-1944. Doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03


39. Nam Lee, Dong Ah Shin, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Yoon Ha, Hyun Chul Shin, Seong Yi. Paradoxical Radiographic Changes of Coflex Interspinous Device with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. WORLD NEUROSURGERY 2016;85;177-184. Doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.069